Wednesday, November 14, 2007

The Democrats' View of Taxes

In speaking of a tax cut, Gene Sperling, Hillary Clinton's chief economic advisor, said the following at a recent National Press Club panel discussion:


The question is, should we be giving an extra $120 billion to people in the top 1 percent?


Democrats see tax cuts as the government giving people money. This is insane! Welfare is giving people money, tax cut are no such thing. One gets the impression from the Democrats that wealthy Americans are a natural resource, to be pumped for as much cash as we need. Jonah Goldberg explains very eloquently in National Review:


You can see where Democrats get this idea, after all. The top 1 percent of wage earners already provide nearly 40 percent of federal income tax revenues. The bottom 50 percent of taxpayers contribute only about 3 percent.


This is dangerous to our form of government.

According to Democrats, it's greedy to want to keep your own money, but it's "justice" to demand someone else's.

Taxes are a necessary evil. But their silver lining is that they foster a sense of accountability and reciprocity between the taxpayer and the tax collector. Indeed, democracy is usually born from this relationship. Widening prosperity brings a rising middle class, which in turn demands the rule of law, incorrupt bureaucracies and political representation in exchange for its hard-earned money.


As the tax burden shifts to the rich, and as fewer people overall pay taxes:


the people are less inclined to see government as their expensive servant and more as their goody-dispensing master.

Democrats keep telling the bottom 95 percent of taxpayers that America's problems would be solved if only the rich people would pay "their fair share" of income taxes. Not only is this patently untrue and a siren song toward a welfare state, it amounts to covetousness as fiscal policy.

. . .it's unhealthy for a democracy when the majority of citizens don't see government as a service they're reluctantly paying for but as an extortionist that cuts them in for a share of the loot.


Beware any candidate who equates tax cuts with government spending. They may cut "spending" so much that we may end up with no money at all.

2 comments:

Matt said...

My word brother... is it too late for you to run for president?... very well put from one who has seen the "benefits of socialism" firsthand...

Becky said...

Brilliant! I don't think I've ever thought of it that way, but it really does seem like the wealthy have been turned into a natural resource. I could see them as a natural resource that continually replaces itself for those seeking jobs. But the Dems. would like to squeeze them dry not realizing the well will run dry along with the job market. Whatever happened to that "carbon footprint" crap?!